From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 0B7E8395C43C; Thu, 19 May 2022 16:14:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0B7E8395C43C
From: "reiter.christoph at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/105507] Ada build fails for 32bit Windows
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 16:14:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: reiter.christoph at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105507-4-KCeGJbeKgc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 16:14:56 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105507

--- Comment #9 from Christoph Reiter <reiter.christoph at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8)
> > We currently link:
> >=20
> > shared: gmp, winpthread, zlib, zstd
> > static: mpc, mpfr, isl
> >=20
> > Not for any particular gcc related reason I think, some dependent packa=
ges
> > have static/shared builds, some don't.
>=20
> Why didn't I think of that for PR ada/100486?

Sorry, I didn't know this was a problem :) I'm not quite sure how I ended up
maintaining this downstream... but here we are.

> So the fix should have been
> to add -shared-libgcc to GCC_LINKERFLAGS in
> gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in:
>=20
> # Strip -Werror during linking for the LTO bootstrap
> GCC_LINKERFLAGS =3D $(filter-out -Werror, $(ALL_LINKERFLAGS)) -shared-lib=
gcc
>=20
> in your setup since you link gnat1 with shared libraries. This should
> override the -static-libgcc in ALL_LINKERFLAGS inherited from toplevel.
>=20
> So you need to to it 1) for GCC 11: rebuild it and reinstall it 2) for GCC
> 12: build it with the patched GCC 11.  Note that this means that GCC 11 is
> currently not fully functional anyway.

Thanks for the detailed instructions. I'll give that a try.

I'm wondering if there are any downsides to just removing "-static-libgcc" =
from
both "--with-stage1-ldflags" and "--with-boot-ldflags". Or is only ada using
exceptions in GCC?

Or should we try linking everything statically to avoid this alltogether?=