From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 6FA92394B039; Fri,  6 May 2022 17:44:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6FA92394B039
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjKysvMTA1NTA5XSBbY29tcGF0aWJpbGl0eV0gZjE2IHN1?=
 =?UTF-8?B?ZmZpeCBub3Qgc3VwcG9ydGVkIGluIEMrKyBtb2RlIC0gdW5hYmxlIHRvIGZp?=
 =?UTF-8?B?bmQgbnVtZXJpYyBsaXRlcmFsIG9wZXJhdG9yIOKAmG9wZXJhdG9yIiJmMTY=?=
 =?UTF-8?B?4oCZ?=
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 17:44:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105509-4-N5AgUD77U1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 17:44:18 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105509

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #0)
> See also https://wg21.link/p1467, notably section 5.10 Literal suffixes

That isn't supported yet *at all*. And it's not in the C++ draft yet.

The current support in G++ is just "some of the C stuff as an extension", n=
ot
an attempt to implement P1467. We will need the f16 suffix for C++23 eventu=
ally
though.=