From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1B8E53858009; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 20:43:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1B8E53858009
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667249000;
	bh=SN3NPhBIZA4wVRsTKENmowHXapn4M26PIUK5qtfDDKw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=D+4hcL7nra/fSBirpWXa67Po12uLGWTyzD73HhnDWJzm5KhB2q2NPEaU/RejCbDxA
	 NR2rY5G3c+qSug/EM0vT5XOi/LHekA7lE7UcLaIO76U3lUetRoeTggjE2SZx7HWeg+
	 l0E76Bgn5pHoFkn9+YlER65ffAA1PTQ0GBjm5NOQ=
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/105511] [12/13 Regression] Spurious warning: "expected
 'template' keyword..." when lt and gt compare over ternary
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 20:43:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-105511-4-yiyWwJMzxq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105511-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105511-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105511

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm not sure if there's anything to fix; the manual says:

In rare cases it is possible to get false positives. To silence this, wrap
the expression in parentheses. For example, the following is treated as a
template, even where m and N are integers:

@smallexample
void NotATemplate (my_class t)
@{
  int N =3D 5;

  bool test =3D t.m < N > (0); // Treated as a template.
  test =3D (t.m < N) > (0); // Same meaning, but not treated as a template.
@}
@end smallexample

so

return ascending ? (a.value < (*b).value) : a.value > (*b).value;

prevents the warning.=