From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D55723857C4A; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 21:26:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D55723857C4A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1709760390; bh=3d4f7x18ZEPmamzoAVkNx9nkKQR5Nj+W08KkP/QLFx8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XXFi+Xlo70VayAR/odM+pw/bvt710aVieEGZ/3wB4gNAxds6ea611lQUxgre9l+D5 5irBOE1q0DZKCQ7xJQHRuBSCZHtKEFatit88uXfRLjbxUtyGLeErAxuiBDpMGZ6F0g SrFFcPW+tOlcfE1TaH4Fj0M4amrS+sDVRnrawA9A= From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/105512] compilation with -fmodules-ts and std=c++20 leads to segfault Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:26:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on see_also bug_status cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105512 Patrick Palka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |wrong-code Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2024-03-06 See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110730 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot g= nu.org --- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to David Truby from comment #1) > Interestingly the issue also goes away if -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=3D0 is > passed to both TUs so I suspect there's an issue with the module file not > exporting the correct ABI for `std::string` Good catch, so this is the same underlying issue as in PR110730.=