From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1CE763858D33; Sat, 7 May 2022 14:15:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1CE763858D33 From: "cooky.ykooc922 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/105516] New: auto() is incorrectly parsed as declaration Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 14:15:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cooky.ykooc922 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 14:15:17 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105516 Bug ID: 105516 Summary: auto() is incorrectly parsed as declaration Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cooky.ykooc922 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- >>From the code snippet below: int main() { int x =3D 1; auto(1); // ok static_cast(auto(x)); // ok auto{x}; // ok auto(x); // error } The compiler emits an error with a message: : In function 'int main()': :6:3: error: declaration of 'auto x' has no initializer 6 | auto(x); // error | ^~~~ Compiler returned: 1 This should be valid because the expression statement line 6 contains a val= id explicit type conversion `auto(expression)`, where a parser may misinterpre= t it as a declaration with an `auto` specifier that contains an identifier and no initializer but is obviously enclosed with parenthesis or maybe because it would parse as function reference or pointer declaration that has `auto` declared return type just like: auto (*fn)() =3D +[]{ return 0; }; But i'm unsure, it's just a guest anyway :>=20 Flag: -std=3Dc++23 Compiler Explorer Link: https://godbolt.org/z/xoKa9Kzch=