From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E1FBF3858417; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:58:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E1FBF3858417
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682441932;
	bh=g6WpRL2fmEFvYWFu/b7sgKv9aWd71jJMIqX/oW8EppI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=CEUA664ArCbOeK0u0bYPH+MzvBiYXsWUaZ8oz4sagAf89B6AmZq7vIa60s5lpyaf8
	 bkB7LOLbNFj2Evx8e63KOHQjlKrvF1BWxEGZGGvH54q/oWq1q+X0+djzwAm2Kso+NV
	 IhN7KNLvwKcv4g9lrVcmfrNTh6YA1l1Rn0r2QNSA=
From: "klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/105523] Wrong warning array subscript [0] is outside
 array bounds
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:58:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: saaadhu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105523-4-f7aSFoHPlF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105523

--- Comment #27 from Wilhelm M <klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com> ---

> I don't know if every embedded developer feels the same way.  (Georg-Joha=
nn
> could chime in with his opinion.)

Indeed, limiting the warning on volatile-qualified ptr would help.=