From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6884D3858D3C; Sun, 22 Jan 2023 23:44:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6884D3858D3C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1674431094;
	bh=5Hqrx7WNE5/YOJIRJ34FxqPqsCwede6BX5F/lCTqW6g=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BdHL9fI3dXBzZCupJPyLdiBm1DVgZY6wP9LLJeWnKMOxBuHV4zOU5n7/57lwsmdqb
	 vH2fTjNZd6DOL+6dDmSOvzTIVsUyXWJODOYSAbgvI9YCdd+LELLhxt55zbbyOVYWH3
	 A/ixYcBAMEOyUwiGEsrQj90l1k2BCm05L2B9M0Vo=
From: "westfw at westfw dot info" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/105523] Wrong warning array subscript [0] is outside
 array bounds
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2023 23:44:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: westfw at westfw dot info
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-105523-4-jx94vaSvwl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105523

William Westfield <westfw at westfw dot info> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |westfw at westfw dot info

--- Comment #15 from William Westfield <westfw at westfw dot info> ---
It seems especially weird that the following AVR program generates the warn=
ing
for only the "&=3D" statement.

#include "avr/io.h"

int main(void){
        DDRD &=3D ~_BV(PD3);
        DDRD |=3D _BV(PD3);
        return 0;
}=