From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 071893858407; Mon,  3 Oct 2022 09:50:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 071893858407
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664790643;
	bh=zPgNsMbc34GbBi+QjQmHjMI9/jh24o+vOPUH02E8Ddo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=trnv7nrqxQyrvsn9bIRbDXGi+r8GMRx8glYgZBTwVeSlYCo5imcbzndfJrp6XbJOM
	 yKZ4M6QunWZy5Kakdie9aMnILkAx2bkZVaIB72bR4+Y+xG7pHT1KO9VznW+6vaRPlD
	 5ZHrsiNZT4n9uKioC8M84Q1A3P8bXl50kHiavZ+4=
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/105531] [13 regression] Recent libsanitizer imports
 breaks Solaris 11.3 build
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 09:50:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105531-4-Kh68K3UiQQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105531-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105531-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105531

--- Comment #6 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #5)
> > --- Comment #4 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > Yes, the change landed to upstream as 3776db9a4fd2080d23d6a5f52e405eea4=
4558761
> > and thus should be part of what I merged in r13-2269-g600413c4f3d703.
>=20
> That's the fix for the previous breakage.  The one Eric is alluding to
> is https://reviews.llvm.org/D133556
> (1cd4d63fb9ab0f04c7151911dde0d58b673823de).  I mean to submit a patch
> cherry-picking that one shortly.

Ok, I see. Please commit the change once you send it.=