From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 202183857020; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 16:24:49 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 202183857020 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1667406289; bh=y2dwK8vHVrz1zFYw8j7grV84G79NyrYS1OgHYmLEwHU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=p09bSqKeGG3PmvjIHHS2uch6aXQS3UlwEgZW52gi282LqqwaaDqHNiFJUFfo+kchv 5FdyW++sEXP+we+NLYnfnDQgXlMQgmpyHvj2Th6/AJFJ110N8vObWFPzCsLRHmE2Us cJC0Q08M0Z/QAhc7XPYS2dNw7yDdffuoOevkuIos= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/105532] [11/12/13 Regression] UBSAN: gcc/hwint.h:293:61: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int' Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 16:24:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105532 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 53820 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D53820&action=3Dedit Patch which is under test This is patch 1 of 2. The 2nd patch adds the assert to catch this earlier o= n.=