From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4B8813959E69; Tue, 10 May 2022 12:26:00 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4B8813959E69 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/105545] [12/13 Regression] Warning for string assignment with _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS since r12-3347-g8af8abfbbace49e6 Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 12:26:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 12:26:00 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105545 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12/13 Regression] Warning |Compiling string assignment |for string assignment with |with _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS |_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS since |fails since |r12-3347-g8af8abfbbace49e6 |r12-3347-g8af8abfbbace49e6 | Keywords| |diagnostic --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to John Buddery from comment #0) > g++ -m64 -c -std=3Dgnu++17 -Wall -O3 -Werror -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS x.= cpp This is only a warning. It fails because you asked it to, with -Werror. Reporting that compilation fails when you turn warnings into errors isn't v= ery interesting, that's the point of -Werror :-) So the bug here is a bogus warning, not that compilation fails. Summary adjusted accordingly.=