From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DE73F3858CDB; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 03:24:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DE73F3858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710905062;
	bh=JKdJrJULQaDSq8XewkBlsQ6v33VYtCb2qWUUO+7HZ5w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=U77uwof20frrbFMT47Tj0SUrePuRpY3j2/FxF8mObechcOIjBuZf7YXoDRvjDFaPB
	 9tklMKV3sQ17fM5c4WMk61W1L1fxLcSJQ8nX3hmcYU2EVno8lFBfssGvsY2DJIoz80
	 XDefCWx1XLgI2AyM949FcRpmZFuPR6vKNltYei/U=
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/105547] No further "Unclassifiable statement" after the
 first one if multiple syntax errors.
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 03:24:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority cc
Message-ID: <bug-105547-4-Yqk7rHGbCh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105547-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105547-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105547

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P4
                 CC|                            |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #2)
> Created attachment 57739 [details]
> Patch fixing the problem
>=20
> This small patch fixes the problem.
> Unfortunately allowing more errors seems counter-productive here.
> As seen in the testsuite changes, the additional errors have little value,
> and add more noise than anything else.
> I'm tempted to close this as WONTFIX.

I like your approach to limit the run-on errors.

I am, however, of the mind that if gfortran gets to the
"Unclassifiable error" message, that perhaps, this should be
a fatal error.=