From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4D9573857400; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:31:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4D9573857400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1679045493;
	bh=q8tHU9T0iuL2q1jk5fUcWPk2ftanvwrImlZSdOJQNoc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=hV56XzQkYrvKF6R4sz3tZCPFq0EJx6w8ONraURPzhkbd7Spx2P7JF9NIOHFIGhBq+
	 y5P/8m30g4y8OZWpLDDHOKrNfn9qKoMWA0u33t0N52bM89/O/303qfZj3j/w4giK9E
	 5eUNrt2BdydqGQUhxdDMkE6DP/mBRk7U32DguIK8=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/105554] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: in
 emit_block_move_hints, at expr.cc:1829 since r9-5509-g5928bc2ec06dd4e7
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:31:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-105554-4-8GGbQdhzXQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105554

--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 54690
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D54690&action=3Dedit
not working patch

So this one fails badly in ipa_param_body_adjustments::common_initialization
where it needs struct function.  Possibly it could be refactored to spit
out the get_new_param_chain early and doing the rest late.

I'm leaving the param_adjustments case untouched with a comment.

Let me test what I have.=