From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 14D953858C53; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:01:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 14D953858C53
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673874102;
	bh=u6IMQDu0y6/jFNs/FccIkwjVeOuZl9mb7Fz1kvy3ZPY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=anUiyXj5ZOMeS+YxEJOfq7S61V5hpzAaMgFMB+bTxkyesDYFIm9Ksh9mQIs3P6Dms
	 v+vPht9vKe2wzbNk4G3IckBtB45hY3ISCaIZN2ZrGcpzcu0VI4Ctc2R5cHaZWd//i2
	 GhwCvc0pT2myTW0SsTH6320W5SnO360TUsglx1ew=
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/105554] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: in
 emit_block_move_hints, at expr.cc:1829 since r9-5509-g5928bc2ec06dd4e7
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:01:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105554-4-HYj64pTxFf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105554

--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105554
>=20
> --- Comment #9 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > fixes the ICE, not sure if we should adjust the PARM_DECLs mode somewhe=
re
> > in target cloning instead though?
>=20
> We can do that in create_target_clone which calls
> node->create_version_clone_with_body where a new function_decl is created.
>=20
> However, the following code does not work:
>=20
>   for (tree arg =3D DECL_ARGUMENTS (new_node->decl); arg; arg =3D DECL_CH=
AIN (arg))
>     if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg)))
>       SET_DECL_MODE (arg, TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (arg)));
>=20
> I'm curious about what needs to be changed once we can get a proper MODE =
for
> the new argument.

Well, most definitely the new decls target options need to be=20
instantiated?=