From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id F3D763858C50; Thu,  9 Feb 2023 12:52:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F3D763858C50
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675947160;
	bh=83Ru5FtzKGtuWeZzhkBqCEcAdHax7skyCdseYwGFGlA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=EROlxVPHcmmiBjhGlNealaXzIFAwlokSTxHYra3BGYaV336socil1Gl2pxwCd5NIg
	 n9f0DfwNuqJs3ws7vA65nGeGv9OG3+M0twZcB6kefFqhlss1TaCl6bA0eclwvJ+OWC
	 OrE969wdQmn2bVqw8G4Bd0Fo4Gst9lhvxRI/2CzI=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/105554] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: in
 emit_block_move_hints, at expr.cc:1829 since r9-5509-g5928bc2ec06dd4e7
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 12:52:39 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105554-4-XVj8rayRVn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105554

--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #11)
> >=20
> > Well, most definitely the new decls target options need to be=20
> > instantiated?
>=20
> Then it must be a tree pass that will properly call set_current_function =
:/
> The multiple_target pass is an IPA pass. Can we go for now with the comme=
nt
> 7?

Hmm, can we deal with this when the clones are materialized (that needs a c=
fun,
no?).=