From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C7DB23858439; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 18:07:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C7DB23858439 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1678990035; bh=RvQAK9+N1NOWS4gSuIqpx9ChVghyTHiMEM0ViCR1lnA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=I0mL27O8mqbW9Mv7uFMLfD++sD8lBzCqKsOOd//OrW2n08hJym7hX5tv+Zx/2FJu/ QLKDmwZxl6x0qfkghSRWDg2lYRosiXVsDZ2qnT939FARKbpL7f7ZJljnA7imDJot/T IcOEmVB7D6JqlM5qbKkKOvIuB0FuE0eil//g51IE= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/105554] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.cc:1829 since r9-5509-g5928bc2ec06dd4e7 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 18:07:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105554 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- A lot of ipa passes use push_cfun: grep push_cfun ipa*.cc ipa-fnsummary.cc: push_cfun (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (node->decl)); ipa-fnsummary.cc: push_cfun (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (node->decl)); ipa-modref.cc: push_cfun (f); ipa-modref.cc: push_cfun (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (node->decl)); ipa-modref.cc: push_cfun (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (node->decl)); ipa-prop.cc: push_cfun (func); ipa-pure-const.cc: push_cfun (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (decl)); ipa-sra.cc: push_cfun (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (node->decl)); ipa-sra.cc: push_cfun (fun); ipa-utils.cc: push_cfun (dstcfun); ipa-visibility.cc: push_cfun (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (e->caller->decl)); ipa-visibility.cc: push_cfun (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (e->caller->decl)); After all, even create_target_clone -> create_version_clone_with_body -> tree_function_versioning already called and and then pop_cfun () again. multiple-target.cc is something so seldom used that another push_cfun/pop_c= fun around the newly proposed loop wouldn't be that bad.=