From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 929553857401; Wed, 11 May 2022 07:51:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 929553857401 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/105558] simple 8-bit integer calculation fails with -O3 / march=core-avx2 on some gfortran 8/9/10 versions Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 07:51:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status keywords everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 07:51:38 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105558 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2022-05-11 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords| |needs-bisection Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Can I ask you to see whether -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize avoids the issue and whether -O3 -fno-vect-cost-model makes the issue appear in more versions? = It could be that this is a resolved issue that awaits backporting of a fix (or where backporting is too difficult). I can confirm the -O3 -march=3Dcore-avx2 failure with GCC 10 and success wi= th GCC 11.=