From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 200973858421; Wed,  6 Dec 2023 10:35:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 200973858421
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1701858941;
	bh=Oqy45n1pzdY8lC4CZDoYOdhEiFGA6e5jtcgRvlD2sck=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=AphQTvBVb5RK9ijMitJlP8SHKAKewQEs+o49Yp9q7Q7EhQZNxwLaPUn2ivemSSzlL
	 RK8TvP3MDycRkPgn4f9FsYoQGABNl8QNxPPaigl4lPhACzuFeWrdOODvqy77s6CT5d
	 DKGNcZWW7FGd4xx9Y+pDicMsF8MOj7rUedCdXW3Y=
From: "romain.geissler at amadeus dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/105562] [12 Regression]
 std::function<bool(char)>::_M_invoker may be used uninitialized in std::regex
 move with -fno-strict-aliasing
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 10:35:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105562-4-GLcOoA7dEg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105562-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105562-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105562

--- Comment #25 from Romain Geissler <romain.geissler at amadeus dot com> -=
--
So it means we should rather go for "silencing" workaround from comment #19=
 ?=