From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 628483858C62; Tue,  8 Nov 2022 12:56:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 628483858C62
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667912184;
	bh=DRt5gXqGcem+Gf5revyRw3/gXgZs1RWDJIOLG1Fqx+0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Y35XPEHdMCygmg/a4M9JMZceYkRLIVxBnwy/ztqA5x2idH/oP1MqLEZhMz0I5E+Lg
	 cx22gT7WagLAUrMEK5J8FS+HUXjEySGdsl77Ms+z1LozN/590Ak+Oi9MkFNokrbaQH
	 mhLwe4hAm1FllJSGTdOR5Q023mGpE/nfpw8NGOUI=
From: "jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/105586] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug
 failure (length) with -O2 -fno-if-conversion -mtune=power4
 -fno-guess-branch-probability
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2022 12:56:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compare-debug-failure
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105586-4-XgpE42KnCI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105586-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105586-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105586

--- Comment #10 from Surya Kumari Jangala <jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #9)
> I read <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601914.h=
tml>
> as approval to backport, fwiw :-)

I read that as: Since it is *not* a regression, no need to backport.=