From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 307B6395447E; Fri, 13 May 2022 22:05:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 307B6395447E From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/105599] g++ by itself is not producing "fatal error: no input files" for darwin target Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 22:05:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component keywords short_desc cf_gcctarget bug_severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 22:05:53 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105599 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|c++ |target Keywords| |diagnostic Summary|g++ binary: undefined |g++ by itself is not |symbols _main referenced |producing "fatal error: no |from __start in crt1.0 |input files" for darwin | |target Target| |x86_64-darwin* Severity|normal |trivial --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- On Linux this produces: apinski@xeond:~/src/p4/octeontxkpu$ ~/upstream-gcc/bin/g++ g++: fatal error: no input files compilation terminated. So it is a darwin specific issue but it is a minor one as it is just a diagnostic issue with invalid invocation anyways.=