From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A6CED3857BA8; Tue, 24 May 2022 19:50:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A6CED3857BA8 From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/105622] [13 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_store_expression with [[no_unique_address]] since r13-160-g967cdbe6629653 Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 19:50:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 19:50:27 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105622 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2540e2c604142889308857657d3510874955336a commit r13-746-g2540e2c604142889308857657d3510874955336a Author: Jason Merrill Date: Fri May 20 16:16:25 2022 -0400 c++: constexpr empty base redux [PR105622] Here calling the constructor for s.__size_ had ctx->ctor for s itself because cxx_eval_store_expression doesn't create a ctor for the empty field. Then cxx_eval_call_expression returned the s initializer, and my empty = base overhaul in r13-160 got confused because the type of init is not an emp= ty class. But that's OK, we should be checking the type of the original L= HS instead. We also want to use initialized_type in the condition, in case init is an AGGR_INIT_EXPR. I spent quite a while working on more complex solutions before coming b= ack to this simple one. PR c++/105622 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_store_expression): Adjust assert. Use initialized_type. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/no_unique_address14.C: New test.=