From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B102E3835421; Fri, 20 May 2022 06:07:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B102E3835421 From: "rguenther at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/105629] [13 Regression] g++.dg/opt/pr94589-2.C for cris, m68k, s390x Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 06:07:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 06:07:15 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105629 --- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 19 May 2022, hp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105629 >=20 > Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: >=20 > What |Removed |Added > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- > CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.o= rg >=20 > --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- > It's r13-204-g93416de0cb7235, "Remove GIMPLE restriction of ! using match= .pd > patterns". A brief look at the diff of the assembly between that and tha= t^ > indicates a code quality regression. I wonder if you can help and "bisect" the actual pattern that is now enabled for GENERIC folding? The testcase is about spaceship optimization and the matching done in forwprop might be quite specific and in the need of a slight adjustment.=