From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E25333856969; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:54:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E25333856969
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1692122097;
	bh=DJZj87NQtbchT4XH7L3qzF7XQOZEBOS5ElPEj+jZMGo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=FGZhvFXQOL/fJSPsE/UR9FpZwgLy+gV8RICp/i8Lo6jFD2UrxHfEScm7cW1neMmnf
	 hWpSsIOTQdfd2UipVhOLurcZXVmfz574FsyiJKmtqmcxyT242vq3jWBIItgN7QeteP
	 m8lGWYvKA9bw9CSxHetZk/IUUmaeOp0hytpjAF7A=
From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/105644] ICE in a fold expression with a requires
 expression: in iterative_hash_template_arg, at cp/pt.cc:1805
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:54:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-105644-4-GB6aBnPxKI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105644-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105644-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105644

Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|needs-reduction             |

--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks for the reduction. Fixing this GCC bug(s) proved to be tricky, but o=
ne
should be able to reliably work around it by avoiding using a requires-expr
directly inside a pack expansion or fold expression and use it indirectly
instead, e.g.

template<class T, int I>
concept foo =3D requires(T t) { { (I, t) } -> C<I>; };

template<typename T, int...I>
constexpr bool check() {
    return (foo<T, I> && ...);
}=