public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/105646] g++ does not raise "xxx may be used uninitialized" warning on dead code when optimizing
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 08:24:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-105646-4-tLwRGpHKNo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-105646-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105646

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener <rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1cd4d52d6ef90b977fb2d80c1cf17f3efa5b01d

commit r13-2926-ga1cd4d52d6ef90b977fb2d80c1cf17f3efa5b01d
Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date:   Fri Aug 19 15:11:14 2022 +0200

    tree-optimization/105646 - re-interpret always executed in uninit diag

    The following fixes PR105646, not diagnosing

    int f1();
    int f3(){
        auto const & a = f1();
        bool v3{v3};
        return a;
    }

    with optimization because the early uninit diagnostic pass only
    diagnoses always executed cases.  The patch does this by
    re-interpreting what always executed means and choosing to
    ignore exceptional and abnormal control flow for this.  At the
    same time it improves things as suggested in a comment - when
    the value-numbering run done without optimizing figures there's
    a fallthru path, consider blocks on it as always executed.

            PR tree-optimization/105646
            * tree-ssa-uninit.cc (warn_uninitialized_vars): Pre-compute
            the set of fallthru reachable blocks from function entry
            and use that to determine wlims.always_executed.

            * g++.dg/uninit-pr105646.C: New testcase.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-29  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-18 14:07 [Bug c++/105646] New: g++ does not raise xxx is used uninitialized warning under some conditions cfy1990 at gmail dot com
2022-05-18 14:13 ` [Bug c++/105646] " cfy1990 at gmail dot com
2022-09-29  8:24 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-09-29  8:24 ` [Bug tree-optimization/105646] g++ does not raise "xxx may be used uninitialized" warning on dead code when optimizing rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-27  0:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-105646-4-tLwRGpHKNo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).