public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redbeard0531 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/105661] New: Comparisons to atomic variables generates less efficient code
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 12:59:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-105661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105661

            Bug ID: 105661
           Summary: Comparisons to atomic variables generates less
                    efficient code
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: redbeard0531 at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

With normal variables, gcc will generate a nice cmp/js pair when checking if
the high bit is null. When using an atomic, gcc generates a movzx/test/js
triple, even though it could use the same codegen as for a non-atomic.

https://godbolt.org/z/GorvWfrsh

#include <atomic>
#include <cstdint>

[[gnu::noinline]] void f();
uint8_t plain;
std::atomic<uint8_t> atomic;

void plain_test() {
    if (plain & 0x80) f();
}

void atomic_test() {
    if (atomic.load(std::memory_order_relaxed) & 0x80) f();
}

With both -O2 and -O3 this generates:

plain_test():
        cmp     BYTE PTR plain[rip], 0
        js      .L4
        ret
.L4:
        jmp     f()
atomic_test():
        movzx   eax, BYTE PTR atomic[rip]
        test    al, al
        js      .L7
        ret
.L7:
        jmp     f()

ARM64 seems to be hit even harder, but I don't know that platform well enough
to know if the non-atomic codegen is valid there
https://godbolt.org/z/c3h8Y1dan. It seems likely though, at least for a relaxed
load.

             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-19 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-19 12:59 redbeard0531 at gmail dot com [this message]
2022-10-26 23:34 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/105661] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-26 23:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-09 18:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-105661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).