From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 54C1E3959E53; Sat,  8 Oct 2022 02:31:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 54C1E3959E53
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1665196306;
	bh=Pd95C0m4B4XAIfo8ApxbaSE7P52dibla/G/Qp4LvxXM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=OHyLXT5GVDI64vTaJGR0JypZpA+FIo9fsHf2IHtEuFJybU9l59GsbYBHTFUCO2J8Z
	 rts2JP4ntHn28LxBah6jHYJdu6FBnJWn3TJGTeORCoih7ZZdaDnUSC27MN/Shgfr+w
	 B0RS4AlVx9ADV/CYcyWbW01pHqfI+FybInDxbKEM=
From: "kees at outflux dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/105679] [12 Regression] extra -Warray-bounds
 warning added with -fsanitize=shift due to jump threading
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 02:31:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kees at outflux dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105679-4-NGNikWnCP2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105679-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105679-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105679

--- Comment #11 from Kees Cook <kees at outflux dot net> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> I sofar refrained from doing this because of the large amount of fallout =
and
> followup changes and I think those are not warranted on the GCC 12 branch.

Totally understandable! Thanks for considering it; I didn't know if it was
"easy" or not, so I thought I'd ask. :)=