From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 2A2D53854169; Wed,  6 Jul 2022 03:14:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2A2D53854169
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/105688] GCC 11.3 doesn't build with the GNU gold
 linker (version 2.37-27.fc36) 1.16: libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.30'
 not found
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 03:14:01 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105688-4-rsMJy2PO4u@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105688-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105688-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 03:14:01 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105688

--- Comment #37 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Vincent Lef=C3=A8vre from comment #36)
> An alternative solution: for programs that are known to potentially fail =
due
> to built libraries and LD_LIBRARY_PATH, GCC could define wrappers that cl=
ean
> up LD_LIBRARY_PATH before executing the real program.

That should not be too hard to do as GCC already does that while building f=
or
as and sometimes ld, see gcc/exec-tool.in. It is mostly for while building
binutils and GCC together (which is supported still).=