From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7236C3857BAE; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:01:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7236C3857BAE
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1666699316;
	bh=yL1A5adYXAEkHlLq9xqyxrLMLkSnQYn0kH4Dh8guxmI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=dOEkkctB6x57qW6zlvaaiq37BKzeMWQGPyMwmVlNVe7kC9zsS3b8gwAXjod0OKnK9
	 MHfRPbcpkzG6h5+HE9IfTm1qGbf8jyGgFVcXmXBk/ViK5ykuwbwoO69d69UrjoLPx4
	 CkbodLxLia11SYNHljztThECOQe22dAmmpM7jDGg=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/105730] [12/13 Regression] Issue with commit - Allow
 std::condition_variable waits to be cancelled
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:01:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105730-4-ToVusne90M@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105730-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105730-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105730

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Lance Fredrickson from comment #0)
> Thread 2 "ld.lld" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to LWP 27688]
> 0x42deada0 in
> std::condition_variable::wait(std::unique_lock<std::mutex>&)@GLIBCXX_3.4.=
11
> () from /mmc/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6

If ld.lld was built against gcc-12 then why is it linking to the
@GLIBCXX_3.4.11 symbol?

Does this target support symbol renaming using .symver ?=