From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 00493385741A; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 09:02:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 00493385741A
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/105740] missed optimization switch
 transformation for conditions with duplicate conditions
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 09:02:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105740-4-hifonzuLAK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105740-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105740-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 09:02:25 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105740

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
IIRC switch conversion was run early originally because it was supposed to
improve inlining heuristics.  One might view if-to-switch + switch-conversi=
on
as canonicalization which would mean running it before things like jump
threading or loop opts (most don't like switches at least).  Then one might
view if-to-switch + switch-conversion as (target specific) code generation
optimization (for that we also have pass_lower_switch, so one thing would
be re-running if-to-switch before that again, supposed pass_lower_switch
also performs the transforms switch-conversion does).

I usually don't like running things again and again.=