From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 38C8E3858C5F; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 23:26:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 38C8E3858C5F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675207571;
	bh=+gdPSBVdQFrZ5LaT2ii6pj7cyLSrl8+RtptcD7PYlPo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=y6gI16mqF5T8uD7EyYAr8NnvF4K91quUv+bbARf0nBc47e/Q75OOp09Iw2roJ8OkO
	 Sr3S04aHCYlp0UmgOtyDv9GRwbBII641nNaVVpu81uFZ/uW1hOp/NOS55Y6olmrMXf
	 4EIeh5hPkDnK2PPAkVEDQ0D57mXyTQ0MFPDgL+/Q=
From: "user99627 at gmx dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/105753] [avr] ICE: in add_clobbers, at
 config/avr/avr-dimode.md:2705
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 23:26:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: user99627 at gmx dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105753-4-UioL39NZYg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105753-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105753-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105753

--- Comment #12 from User99627 <user99627 at gmx dot com> ---
Here's some feedback.

I asked in Manjaro Forums to make it so that avr-gcc is capped to version
10.1.0. The answer has been "Manjaro uses Arch application tree".

So I created an account to Arch bugzilla and asked the same question. The b=
ug
report was almost immediately closed ("not our problem, it's upstream").
Upstream of what? I wonder.

Asking here doesn't seem to make things budge any farther.

So I wonder what's the point in lecturing users about contributing and
reporting bugs when the people responsible for packaging such a critical,
dysfunctional application are blatantly ignoring those reports and leave us=
ers
to themselves.=