From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 317F6385042A; Sun, 29 May 2022 16:17:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 317F6385042A From: "davidfromonline at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/105768] New: Missed optimization: shifting signed to unsigned range before comparison not removed Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 16:17:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: davidfromonline at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 16:17:38 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105768 Bug ID: 105768 Summary: Missed optimization: shifting signed to unsigned range before comparison not removed Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: davidfromonline at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The following translation unit: ``` #include inline unsigned to_unsigned(int value) { return (unsigned)value + (unsigned)INT_MIN; } bool f(int lhs, int rhs) { return to_unsigned(lhs) < to_unsigned(rhs); } ``` when compiled with `-O3` optimizes to ``` f(int, int): add esi, -2147483648 add edi, -2147483648 cmp edi, esi setb al ret ``` I would expect this to optimize to ``` f(int, int): cmp edi, esi setl al ret ``` Essentially, I want gcc to recognize that a signed value + minimum signed value, as an unsigned, has the same comparison semantics as just comparing = the original signed value. This code pattern comes up in implementations of radix sort (specifically, ska_sort) when it falls back to std::sort (for instance, because the range = is small). See it live: https://godbolt.org/z/Gn4rxr3nY=