From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 577133858D3C; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:15:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 577133858D3C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1666174507;
	bh=UkKezjbOE6CAcRN6FV4/ldp714y8a7RvVIXuei2k0+I=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=SqUjlMJisFQXeGj5TWjeYCH9lTcil09SPdd81DDis5AP2ClG/ReMJhQ8kZ2l797TM
	 Q2voS3k0pZnwOmFgm6wzAHrZoZf3bkXiK2PLrZ2GFXkI+SsiurYAXx3XdyPAfJRy6E
	 pUXnRrz/nsP8LT9LDL9JJfyBSxojDL0FVLyWcoTY=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/105769] [11/12/13 Regression] program
 segmentation fault with -ftree-vectorize and nested lambdas
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:15:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority keywords
Message-ID: <bug-105769-4-eG9MmNPtim@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105769-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105769-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105769

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P2
           Keywords|                            |needs-bisection

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #1)
> Started with param change in r11-4438-g686c1b70c70a8df4.

Can you bisect with very large param?=