From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id E2461385E03D; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:31:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E2461385E03D
From: "jeff at jgarrett dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/105774] New: Bogus overflow in constant expression
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 14:31:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jeff at jgarrett dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-105774-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 14:31:32 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105774

            Bug ID: 105774
           Summary: Bogus overflow in constant expression
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.1.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jeff at jgarrett dot org
  Target Milestone: ---

The following is diagnosed as ill-formed by GCC but not by Clang:

    int main() {
      constexpr auto _ =3D [] {
        char x =3D 127;
        return ++x;
      }();
    }

<source>:5:5: error: overflow in constant expression [-fpermissive]

On godbolt https://godbolt.org/z/91oeGsEbh
Originally from
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/72425404/still-unsure-about-signed-inte=
ger-overflow-in-c

I believe that this is well-formed. [expr.pre.incr]/1 says x++ is equivalen=
t to
x+=3D1. [expr.ass]/6 says that x+=3D1 is equivalent to x=3Dx+1 except that =
x is only
evaluated once. That expression x=3Dx+1 avoids overflow through integer
promotion.

The same code with x+=3D1 instead of ++x is allowed by GCC.=