From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CECBE3857346; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 12:18:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CECBE3857346 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/105820] [13 Regression] ICE in invert, at value-range.cc:1971 Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 12:18:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 12:18:57 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105820 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |13.0 CC| |amacleod at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- #1 0x0000000001ced6a0 in irange::invert (this=3D0x7fffffff1f30) at /space/rguenther/src/gcc/gcc/value-range.cc:2166 2166 gcc_checking_assert (!undefined_p () && !varying_p ()); well, invert(undefined) =3D varying, invert(varying) =3D undefined - not su= re why we assert here. (undefined is another name for 'empty') I've wondered of several places checking for undefined/varying before calling .invert () ...=