From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4EDCB3882020; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:23:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4EDCB3882020
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1690449791;
	bh=gbSB9QlY7qSkYQem51e9YUMzMQAr70tQcbTEGVWbq0U=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=dKO9e2w55SsaFcTsuFsfLb+4vvCcj7wyg+lVQR/VTrguE5sRFYFmEAKwAkx6zhCAz
	 cR7QYHuZUKV7+oUOOg3H+7GHEtHkiMxQHilJWLs1pZ6H5OAZADeYX0p78UqNj4jiCc
	 FUS/rATA6DRD2DyXgw8w4uZF2lzj5bYvOtYqwqp0=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/105832] [13/14 Regression] Dead Code
 Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:23:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-105832-4-9WMB3XEMVJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105832-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105832-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105832

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|13.2                        |13.3

--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #11)
> Looks viable to me.  Are you thinking match.pd?

Yes I was thinking that. I should note that LLVM does that transformation t=
oo.

--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 13.2 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 13.3.=