From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4E6E3383B781; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 21:40:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4E6E3383B781 From: "roger at nextmovesoftware dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/105853] [13 regression] ice in pieces_addr constructor Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2022 21:40:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: roger at nextmovesoftware dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: roger at nextmovesoftware dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on priority bug_status everconfirmed cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2022 21:40:16 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105853 Roger Sayle changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2022-06-05 Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC| |roger at nextmovesoftware = dot com Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |roger at nextmoveso= ftware dot com --- Comment #2 from Roger Sayle --- Doh! Mine. Sorry for the breakage. My patch/solution for PR 105856 also resolves this PR. Calling expand_expr with a DECL_INITIAL CONSTRUCTOR from load_register_parameters can trigger unintended pathways, instead we/I need= to call the lower level store_constructor directly.=