* [Bug c++/105925] [11/12 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X'
2022-06-11 8:53 [Bug c++/105925] New: [11.1 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' jehova at existiert dot net
@ 2022-06-11 12:59 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-16 13:23 ` [Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-11 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[11.1 Regression] Could not |[11/12 Regression] Could
|convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from |not convert '{{0, 0.0}}'
|'<brace-enclosed |from '<brace-enclosed
|initializer list>' to 'X' |initializer list>' to 'X'
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X'
2022-06-11 8:53 [Bug c++/105925] New: [11.1 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' jehova at existiert dot net
2022-06-11 12:59 ` [Bug c++/105925] [11/12 " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-16 13:23 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-16 13:23 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-16 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 101837 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X'
2022-06-11 8:53 [Bug c++/105925] New: [11.1 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' jehova at existiert dot net
2022-06-11 12:59 ` [Bug c++/105925] [11/12 " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-16 13:23 ` [Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-16 13:23 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-16 13:24 ` [Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-16 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2022-06-16
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sorry, wrong bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74
2022-06-11 8:53 [Bug c++/105925] New: [11.1 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' jehova at existiert dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-16 13:23 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-16 13:24 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-23 15:42 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-16 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] Could |[11/12/13 Regression] Could
|not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' |not convert '{{0, 0.0}}'
|from '<brace-enclosed |from '<brace-enclosed
|initializer list>' to 'X' |initializer list>' to 'X'
| |since
| |r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74
2022-06-11 8:53 [Bug c++/105925] New: [11.1 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' jehova at existiert dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-16 13:24 ` [Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-23 15:42 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-23 21:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-23 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74
2022-06-11 8:53 [Bug c++/105925] New: [11.1 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' jehova at existiert dot net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-23 15:42 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-23 21:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-23 21:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-23 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill <jason@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d610ae121e8ecd738de4dc01e6ac11ecf7c2327e
commit r13-1226-gd610ae121e8ecd738de4dc01e6ac11ecf7c2327e
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jun 23 16:04:02 2022 -0400
c++: anon union designated init [PR105925]
This testcase was failing because CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DESIGNATED_INIT wasn't
getting set on the introduced CONSTRUCTOR for the anonymous union, and
build_aggr_conv uses that flag to decide whether to pay attention to the
indexes of the CONSTRUCTOR. So set the flag when we see a designator
rather
than relying on copying it from another CONSTRUCTOR.
This avoids some redundant errors on desig4.C because we stop setting
CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DESIGNATED_INIT on _Complex CONSTRUCTORs where it's
nonsense.
PR c++/105925
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* decl.cc (reshape_init_array_1): Set
CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DESIGNATED_INIT here.
(reshape_init_class): And here.
(reshape_init): Not here.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/ext/desig4.C: Remove extra errors.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/desig26.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74
2022-06-11 8:53 [Bug c++/105925] New: [11.1 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' jehova at existiert dot net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-23 21:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-23 21:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-23 21:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-23 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill <jason@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c72f1bfc3469422460d86314a081353632d4bcb
commit r13-1227-g6c72f1bfc3469422460d86314a081353632d4bcb
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jun 23 14:41:19 2022 -0400
c++: designated init cleanup [PR105925]
build_aggr_conv expects to run after reshape_init, which will usually have
filled out all the CONSTRUCTOR indexes; there's no reason to limit using
those to the case where the user gave an explicit designator.
PR c++/105925
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* call.cc (build_aggr_conv): Don't depend on
CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DESIGNATED_INIT.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74
2022-06-11 8:53 [Bug c++/105925] New: [11.1 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' jehova at existiert dot net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-23 21:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-23 21:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-24 0:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-24 0:46 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-23 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
<jason@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db29b66193407d2fd6a04a07ecbd961c8d3f7d62
commit r12-8511-gdb29b66193407d2fd6a04a07ecbd961c8d3f7d62
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jun 23 16:04:02 2022 -0400
c++: anon union designated init [PR105925]
This testcase was failing because CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DESIGNATED_INIT wasn't
getting set on the introduced CONSTRUCTOR for the anonymous union, and
build_aggr_conv uses that flag to decide whether to pay attention to the
indexes of the CONSTRUCTOR. So set the flag when we see a designator
rather
than relying on copying it from another CONSTRUCTOR.
PR c++/105925
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* decl.cc (reshape_init_array_1): Set
CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DESIGNATED_INIT here.
(reshape_init_class): And here.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/desig26.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74
2022-06-11 8:53 [Bug c++/105925] New: [11.1 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' jehova at existiert dot net
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-23 21:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-24 0:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-24 0:46 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-24 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
<jason@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:553aecc570ce4ef5c751dc39b83bfbde6380f953
commit r11-10091-g553aecc570ce4ef5c751dc39b83bfbde6380f953
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jun 23 16:04:02 2022 -0400
c++: anon union designated init [PR105925]
This testcase was failing because CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DESIGNATED_INIT wasn't
getting set on the introduced CONSTRUCTOR for the anonymous union, and
build_aggr_conv uses that flag to decide whether to pay attention to the
indexes of the CONSTRUCTOR. So set the flag when we see a designator
rather
than relying on copying it from another CONSTRUCTOR.
PR c++/105925
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* decl.c (reshape_init_array_1): Set
CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DESIGNATED_INIT here.
(reshape_init_class): And here.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/desig26.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105925] [11/12/13 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' since r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74
2022-06-11 8:53 [Bug c++/105925] New: [11.1 Regression] Could not convert '{{0, 0.0}}' from '<brace-enclosed initializer list>' to 'X' jehova at existiert dot net
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-24 0:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-24 0:46 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-24 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105925
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work| |11.3.1, 12.1.1, 13.0
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 11.4/12.2/13.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread