From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 428733858C20; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 00:57:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 428733858C20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1679101051;
	bh=DH2Qwx0HSp24WCRJjbMpXEslm1/6hyYHdVs1nP1zCS0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=RyRoluWuNIWZsIbpNmExa0ErTl1U6YSKBlhCQc3XA8dFzRcR0aWqT/rKIJj/u9qvp
	 bxFMjrj4Qx0euai1ZnR84S2cXsKEopMJKrBXrnz9uT7jqoJ1sZ2rkwWFG2B6dG8Pk+
	 dd+T4dqrLowrCAQroTC0adCnV/w9l3As5wEOAM50=
From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/105959] new test case
 c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-4.c from r13-967-g6cf276ddf22066
 fails
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 00:57:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105959-4-doYMEdKDkS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105959

--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #13)
> Created attachment 54698 [details]
> Patch that I'm about to put through full testing

(and of course there was an additional hurdle to DTRT for the new argument,
heh)
Yes, like that, LGTM, thanks!
(not an approver)=