From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 77D253857400; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 20:37:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 77D253857400
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/105980] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1,
 at final.cc:2811
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 20:37:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105980-4-5WDQhghhg1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105980-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105980-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 20:37:45 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105980

--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> So, shall we temporarily disable -mforce-indirect-call during the mi thunk
> output?

Something like this

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
index e03f86d4a23..394fcac53a2 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
@@ -21382,6 +21382,7 @@ x86_output_mi_thunk (FILE *file, tree thunk_fndecl,
HOST_WIDE_INT delta,
   rtx this_reg, tmp, fnaddr;
   unsigned int tmp_regno;
   rtx_insn *insn;
+  int saved_flag_force_indirect_call =3D flag_force_indirect_call;

   if (TARGET_64BIT)
     tmp_regno =3D R10_REG;
@@ -21394,6 +21395,9 @@ x86_output_mi_thunk (FILE *file, tree thunk_fndecl,
HOST_WIDE_INT delta,
   tmp_regno =3D DX_REG;
       else
   tmp_regno =3D CX_REG;
+
+      if (flag_pic)
+  flag_force_indirect_call =3D 0;
     }

   emit_note (NOTE_INSN_PROLOGUE_END);
@@ -21561,6 +21565,8 @@ x86_output_mi_thunk (FILE *file, tree thunk_fndecl,
HOST_WIDE_INT delta,
   final (insn, file, 1);
   final_end_function ();
   assemble_end_function (thunk_fndecl, fnname);
+
+  flag_force_indirect_call =3D saved_flag_force_indirect_call;
 }

 static void=