From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4124C3858295; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:32:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4124C3858295
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1666175549;
	bh=cN6w47/abu8WqyXHsbFmvl14uYjVHlgvctgeuwdVSfQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Wza1uR9c4j7qoiu7TvFgFR4EDaPYi0hp7dmx0lz02He3YqwUuAdmEFYAiGEIlcSaU
	 bCrGI80UoMcb24CvgUG5tOxF8kEki6mvAinkxmFI3Jh8k6d0aCFcuCtbJ/O0615mT8
	 Sl2+eSu224QeYZYMPvrUxhtZYuMqJuPziQUy3SnM=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/105988] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in
 linemap_ordinary_map_lookup, at libcpp/line-map.cc:1064 since
 r6-4873-gebedc9a3414d8422
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:32:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-105988-4-m4SLY3Qn7k@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-105988-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-105988-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D105988

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The rtx_insn in question is

(note 13 14 17 5 [bb 5] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)

but INSN_LOCATION here is the NOTE kind!?  Still it says INSN_HAS_LOCATION
and the XUINT access RTL_CHECK2 isn't flagging this.

What's the correct check to use here in

/* Dump file:line from INSN's location info to dump_file.  */

static void
dump_insn_location (rtx_insn *insn)
{
  if (dump_file && INSN_HAS_LOCATION (insn))
    {
      expanded_location xloc =3D insn_location (insn);
      fprintf (dump_file, " %s:%i", xloc.file, xloc.line);
    }
}

?=