From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9739D3856DD9; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 23:49:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9739D3856DD9 From: "goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/106038] New: x86_64 vectorization of ALU ops using xmm registers prematurely Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 23:49:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 23:49:52 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106038 Bug ID: 106038 Summary: x86_64 vectorization of ALU ops using xmm registers prematurely Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: goldstein.w.n at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- See: https://godbolt.org/z/YxWEn6Y65 Basically in all cases where the total amount of memory touched is <=3D 8 b= ytes (word size) the vectorization pass is choosing to inefficiently use xmm registers to vectorize the unrolled loops.=20 GPRs (as GCC <=3D 9.5 was doing) is faster / less code size. Related to: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106022=