From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9F262385B52D; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 17:01:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9F262385B52D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1679677316; bh=ELIUh4Xs7JJlaDXDJqv2fxMq8vuHCUYFVF4o+huEKp0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OMvqupaTAOkI3OmBIWCyb1Te62s2MaefgccJPvDAiIAOur+Bn//WjQbrHhUrV5Cqt m9cZVIuMuQetKPbXuLM/FT2+gfM1WJOa39Y/8xL5XUmCeOU8h/LK2UPMRrv/nf/l1j w4wD55d0KyXcIyhC7F2NRPNivwTk0Ko3unjvgG6U= From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/106069] [12/13 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-forwprop -maltivec on ppc64le Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 17:01:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106069 --- Comment #36 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #34) > What is the state of this PR? I see patches posted in August, but don't = see > anything committed... I've seen some patch submissions and pings in February and it looks like it just needs a review. I'll work with the team to get this reviewed.=