From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E29A63853549; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:28:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E29A63853549 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106073] [12/13 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:28:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status everconfirmed keywords cf_reconfirmed_on short_desc target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:28:20 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106073 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |needs-bisection, wrong-code Last reconfirmed| |2022-06-24 Summary|wrong code at -O3 on |[12/13 Regression] wrong |x86_64-linux-gnu |code at -O3 on | |x86_64-linux-gnu Target Milestone|--- |12.2 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed. When we remove: au =3D (int*) &au; The testcase works; au is otherwise unused. I noticed that the major different between with and without that line was a loop was unrolled and then SLP vectorized. I have not looked into it any further really.=