public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/106120] [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:54:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-106120-4-2FgCsVMboA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-106120-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120

--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #10)
> Since 20230106, this test produces an XPASS, according to gcc-testresults
> postings this happens everywhere:
> 
> +XPASS: g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C  -std=gnu++98 pr106120 (test for
> bogus messages, line 144)
> 
> The corresponding line is
> 
>   T (S (2), new int16_t[r_imin_imax + 1]); // { dg-bogus "into a region of
> size" "pr106120" { xfail { c++98_only } } }
> 
> I think that xfail should just be removed?

Yes, though I think the date 20230106 is wrong (at least regarding the
"everywhere") and maybe a typo for 20231006, at least according to my own logs
- where I unsurprisingly don't track XPASS.  Gotta fix that.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-21 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-28 16:01 [Bug other/106120] New: " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 17:25 ` [Bug other/106120] " aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 18:14 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-29  0:03 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-29  9:44 ` [Bug testsuite/106120] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-08 23:10 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-09  6:29 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-14 15:50 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-20 14:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-10  0:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-10 18:34 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-10 18:37 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-10 22:52 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-21 15:21 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-21 17:54 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-11-22  9:09 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-11-23  0:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-106120-4-2FgCsVMboA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).