From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 175E33858C36; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:09:32 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 175E33858C36 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1700644172; bh=S93NoqgobWbOlBfxRnuXnAqQsAEynz6B8r8YbQ7gPKg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pXDuBMo+xcbTV74n8JHQUXMWD9vbQkiS5FYU/jcsYiVttaT73WeVw/tW10rarcCBK CsBO+DkG2fk2yeJNcL4vFbAmKf8ilTdZYKA32yQx4IuFnb4lVzNac+ulKOeW2cd10u xCpedqQIaJFPaA6GMHA1yjcXZIeO9/GPT/B9H2f4= From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/106120] [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:09:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, patch, testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106120 --- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- > (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #10) >> Since 20230106, this test produces an XPASS, according to gcc-testresults >> postings this happens everywhere: >>=20 >> +XPASS: g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C -std=3Dgnu++98 pr106120 (tes= t for >> bogus messages, line 144) >>=20 >> The corresponding line is >>=20 >> T (S (2), new int16_t[r_imin_imax + 1]); // { dg-bogus "into a region = of >> size" "pr106120" { xfail { c++98_only } } } >>=20 >> I think that xfail should just be removed? > > Yes, though I think the date 20230106 is wrong (at least regarding the > "everywhere") and maybe a typo for 20231006, at least according to my own= logs > - where I unsurprisingly don't track XPASS. Gotta fix that. Actually, it's 20231106, I just cannot type. The XPASSes are included in the make mail-report.log output, so I have them archived for my targets. Thanks for fixing this.=