From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3A971384B0CB; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:03:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3A971384B0CB From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/106144] New: wide_int shifted_mask() and mask() do not agree Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:03:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:03:41 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106144 Bug ID: 106144 Summary: wide_int shifted_mask() and mask() do not agree Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org CC: amacleod at redhat dot com, mikestump at comcast dot ne= t, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- A mask of 128 bits should match a shifted mask of 128 bits where the shift = is 0, but the following assert is failing: { wide_int mask1 =3D wi::mask (128, false, 128); wide_int mask2 =3D wi::shifted_mask (0, 128, false, 128); mask1.dump (); mask2.dump (); gcc_assert (mask1 =3D=3D mask2); } The output is: [...,0xffffffffffffffff], precision =3D 128 [0xffffffffffffffff,0xffffffffffffffff], precision =3D 128 I would expect both masks to be the same.=