From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AB68F384D1A8; Tue,  6 Sep 2022 12:57:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AB68F384D1A8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1662469025;
	bh=k3yuDExPZbn7we7rpDjw9Qsb3BTnkOeyOsQ1kLyhAD8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ca7SrNSTi95vpXfUUiSNlIcHQhel7KgMGpvbzxagyvnN6rR43vljQHMFYMRwER3ZK
	 GCI3n7hrleDmowjXi0XWoeZF99yJ9+v0BnPMKm7pn0Hs3L6HIP0x4EFSzKRj3tIO0P
	 BlO/u0iSHaDd1ulQiaIr1MwTV6Pr/uNZRSb6uXOs=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106155] [12/13 Regression] spurious "may be
 used uninitialized" warning
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 12:57:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106155-4-HUuoWN9wqa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106155-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106155-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106155

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This should now be fixed up to the confusion due to IVOPTs.  As said the
narrowing is problematic here :/=