From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 22760385829C; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 12:26:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 22760385829C From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/106180] [13 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 since r13-1418-g73f942c08deef3 Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 12:26:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 12:26:53 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106180 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- That doesn't really matter, many instructions just use the g, q etc. modifi= ers so that the correct Intel syntax is written, the RTL can have larger MEM ju= st fine, the only thing that is wrong is e.g. if the expander has V2SF operand= to widen it to V4SF using a subreg. But if you match an instruction that had V4SF operand, the fact that you actually just read 8 bytes from it rather t= han 16 isn't that bad. Especially for the unpacks which are paired, one hi and= one lo which together read the whole memory anyway.=