public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 10:42:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-106187-4-uNfV5733G0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-106187-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187

--- Comment #41 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #40)
> reload_cse_noop_set_p is the function that decides the store is redundant. 
> For this parallel case it's being called once for each set, but all the
> cases return true, so the store insn gets removed.

OK, so in the end it's rtx_equal_for_cselib_1 that needs similar treatment
as in r10-7635 but only for a WAR mode (when we check whether a SET_DEST
already contains SET_SRC).  I'm not sure if the info required is
eventually available, I'd have to trace where it decides the values are
the same.  If we can't reasonably do that we'd have to axe
reload_cse_noop_set_p when flag_strict_aliasing is in effect.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-25 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-04 16:23 [Bug c++/106187] New: armhf: Miscompilation with -O2 mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com
2022-07-04 16:37 ` [Bug c++/106187] " mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com
2022-07-04 16:37 ` mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com
2022-07-04 16:42 ` [Bug c++/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at all optimization levels mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com
2022-07-04 20:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-04 20:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-05  7:18 ` [Bug target/106187] " mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com
2022-07-05  7:46 ` [Bug target/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working) jan.wassenberg at gmail dot com
2022-07-05  8:00 ` mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com
2022-07-07  7:50 ` mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com
2022-07-07  8:00 ` mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com
2022-07-07  9:38 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-08  9:01 ` mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com
2022-07-08  9:01 ` mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com
2022-07-08  9:03 ` mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com
2022-07-08 13:50 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-08 13:59 ` malat at debian dot org
2022-07-08 14:16 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-08 14:18 ` malat at debian dot org
2022-07-08 14:51 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-08 15:03 ` malat at debian dot org
2022-07-08 17:24 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-08 17:31 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-08 19:27 ` jan.wassenberg at gmail dot com
2022-07-14 13:03 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-14 13:18 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-14 16:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-18 15:45 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-18 15:48 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-19  7:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-19  9:00 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-19  9:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-21  9:25 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-22 12:52 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-22 13:24 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-25  6:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-25  9:44 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-25  9:50 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-07-25  9:59 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-25 10:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-25 10:26 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/106187] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-25 10:33 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-25 10:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-07-25 10:48 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-25 11:03 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-07-25 11:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-25 13:04 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-25 14:45 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-07-27 13:35 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-28 16:51 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-03  9:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-03  9:16 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-10  7:06 ` malat at debian dot org
2022-08-10  7:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-02  9:28 ` malat at debian dot org
2022-09-02 12:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-02 12:32 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-02 14:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-27 15:28 ` malat at debian dot org
2022-09-27 15:54 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-20 17:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-106187-4-uNfV5733G0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).