From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 645583857B81; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 04:41:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 645583857B81 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710132106; bh=N8HvuWDgxI2JKDvcdGEAeB8UqxmuyBQXF3KSyXVjeMM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RW7pR7596eu+leja+zHDxe62BCrkwnJQS4kYJgrulGUniF1ghLZe4CsBo66P8ds22 k1HWIYD41hH472HWCJ1meFma7trIKvVyaSqKcZirtVMxvXicqLbWnxHlo7jOnNgNn9 PA0lqPdv60VnruX4pHa7VufsJYDQ7Cj6U2JHRtDg= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/106208] [12 Regression] ICE in branch_prob, at profile.cc:1459 since r12-5275-gbcebd05720540e25 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 04:41:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106208 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE |[12 Regression] ICE in |in branch_prob, at |branch_prob, at |profile.cc:1459 since |profile.cc:1459 since |r12-5275-gbcebd05720540e25 |r12-5275-gbcebd05720540e25 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- >Should we still add these Fortran test cases -- or is in fact 'gfortran' s= till generating "undesirable" location information?=20 The function (_caf_init.0) is a machine generated function and does not rea= lly have any location information associated with it. it is an artifact of fcoarray=3Dlib registering the coarray at initialization time. So I am going to say this just needs a testcase, removing the 13/14 regress= ion marker otherwise.=