From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 39B603858C55; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 20:17:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 39B603858C55
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/106209] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at
 fortran/decl.cc:2132
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 20:17:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106209-4-5v0vuzGMkf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106209-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106209-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 20:17:26 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106209

--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> -=
--
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 07:35:21PM +0000, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>=20
> --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> > Instead of an assert(), simply return false to give gfortran a chance to
> > emit an error.
>=20
> Steve, your patch does fix z1, but not z2, which hits the
>=20
>   gfc_internal_error ("gfc_array_size failed");

Sorry about that.  Your patch looks good to me.=